Back
Technology

RallyBoard Staff

Why Community Technology Decisions Are Getting Harder
Member engagement is the single most common driver of association technology investment. According to Higher Logic's 2025 Association Member Experience Report — based on 440 current members and 112 nonmembers — 82% of members feel engaged with their association, up from 67% in 2024, but expectations for personalized, frictionless digital experiences are rising alongside that confidence.
The challenge for association executives isn't finding a platform. It's understanding what kind of platform solves the specific engagement problems they face.
Community platforms — the focus of this guide — are built around many-to-many interaction: forums, discussion boards, resource libraries, member directories, and content sharing. They give members an always-on space to connect around shared interests and get value between annual meetings. They are the right foundation for most associations.
But community platforms are not equally effective at all types of engagement. Passive content consumption and open-ended discussion are different from structured, cohort-based peer learning. Associations increasingly run both in parallel — and the technology choices should reflect that.
A Note on RallyBoard
RallyBoard appears first in this guide, but with an important distinction: it is not a community platform. It is a peer learning platform — purpose-built for associations to design, match, schedule, and measure cohort-based programs such as group mentoring, mastermind groups, study groups, volunteer cohorts, and emerging leader programs.
RallyBoard is included here because:
Association buyers frequently evaluate it alongside community platforms
It is often deployed as a layer on top of an existing community platform (Higher Logic, Hivebrite, etc.)
It solves a specific, high-value engagement problem that pure community platforms are not designed for
If your primary need is a forum, content library, member directory, or discussion board, RallyBoard is not the right tool. But if you're building a complete member engagement strategy, peer learning programs are often the highest-engagement programs an association runs — and RallyBoard is the leading platform in that category for associations.
The Platforms
1. RallyBoard — Best for Structured Peer Learning Programs
Category: Peer Learning Platform (complements community platforms) Best for: Associations running cohort-based programs alongside a community platform Website: rallyboard.com
RallyBoard is an AI-powered platform that helps associations design and scale peer learning programs: group mentoring, mastermind cohorts, emerging leader programs, certification study groups, volunteer networks, and annual meeting extensions. It handles AI-based matching, automated scheduling, Zoom-integrated meetings, collaboration tools, behavioral nudging, and engagement analytics.
What makes it different from every other platform on this list: RallyBoard is not a community platform. It doesn't replace Higher Logic or Hivebrite — it extends them. Associations use RallyBoard when they want their community members to do something together in a structured, recurring format, not just discuss topics asynchronously.
Customer evidence: The Project Management Institute (PMI) used RallyBoard to run its largest-ever group mentoring program in 2025 — 62 group meetings, 16,500 minutes on Zoom, across participants in multiple time zones and career stages. PMI's VP of Learning, Dr. Kelly Heuer, cited a "shared belief in the power of peer learning" as the foundation of the partnership. HFMA (140,000 members) deployed RallyBoard across three member segments — Executive Council, Chapter Leaders, and Emerging Leaders — generating 16 active cohorts, 60+ Zoom meetings, and 278 distinct agenda topics between September 2025 and January 2026. NACU launched 24 active cohorts, engaged 650+ member users, and doubled the number of active volunteer chairs — without adding staff.
Where RallyBoard fits in the tech stack:
Works alongside: Higher Logic, Hivebrite, Forj, Breezio, Circle
Integrates with: Zoom (native), AMS systems via intake forms
Not a replacement for: Any community platform on this list
Trade-offs: RallyBoard does not offer open forums, resource libraries, member directories, or many-to-many discussion tools. If those are your primary needs, a community platform is a better fit. RallyBoard is purpose-built for structured, small-group, recurring engagement programs — and that focus is both its key strength and its intentional scope.
2. Higher Logic Thrive — Best Enterprise Community Platform for Associations
Category: Community Platform Best for: Mid-to-large associations seeking an all-in-one community and marketing platform Website: higherlogic.com
Higher Logic is the most established community platform purpose-built for associations, trusted by more than 3,000 organizations worldwide and backed by nearly two decades of sector experience. Its flagship product, Higher Logic Thrive, combines online community, marketing automation, and (via Thrive Learn) learning management in a single platform.
Higher Logic's 2025 Association Community Benchmark Report — drawing on data from approximately 1,500 associations — found that communities incorporating volunteering and mentoring see 2.4x more logins, 2x more discussions, and nearly 2x more contributors than those that don't. Communities with job boards achieve nearly 2x the logins and contributors.
Key strengths:
Discussion forums, Q&A, resource libraries, and event tools built for associations
AI-powered Smart Newsletter and automated digest emails
An AI Assistant that finds answers based on community content or creates a post to "ask the humans" if an answer isn't found
Deep AMS integration ecosystem
Extensive customer success and implementation support
Trade-offs: Higher Logic is one of the pricier options on this list, reflecting its enterprise positioning. Some users note a steeper learning curve for advanced configuration. The platform's heritage is in listserv-style community discussion; newer UX paradigms (mobile-first, social-feed-style) are evolving but not yet native to the experience.
Pricing: Custom enterprise pricing. Generally positioned at the higher end of the market.
3. Hivebrite — Best for Highly Customizable Association Communities
Category: Community Platform Best for: Associations prioritizing white-label branding, modern UX, and multi-chapter management Website: hivebrite.io
Hivebrite is a modern, highly customizable community management platform used by professional associations, alumni networks, and nonprofits. Notable clients include the American Heart Association, NYSE, JA Worldwide, WWF, the University of Notre Dame, and the American Bar Association. Hivebrite secured $37 million in Series B funding in October 2023, led by Quadrille Capital.
Hivebrite's approach to AI includes smart member matching built on its acquisition of Orbiit, an intelligent matching technology company, allowing customizable matching criteria such as industry, interests, and experience while automating coordination of one-to-one and small group connections.
Key strengths:
Highly configurable branded community with custom URL and mobile app
Native integrations with AMS platforms including Fonteva and Netforums, enabling bidirectional data synchronization
Chapter and committee management built into the core platform
Event management, job boards, mentoring modules, and donation tools
Modern, social-media-influenced UX that members tend to find more intuitive than legacy platforms
Trade-offs: Some G2 reviewers note that while Hivebrite offers strong functionality, areas of the platform can feel unintuitive for new members, and the user interface can be overwhelming. Pricing is positioned at the higher end and may be prohibitive for smaller associations. Implementation requires investment in configuration.
Pricing: Custom pricing; no publicly available free trial.
4. Forj — Best for Associations Wanting Community + LMS in One Platform
Category: Community + Learning Platform Best for: Associations that want community engagement and online learning in a single, unified system Website: forj.ai
Forj positions itself as the "single solution for community and learning" for associations and professional networks. Forj serves over 300 clients and reaches more than a million professionals. The platform integrates Forj Connect (community) with Forj Learn (LMS) and Forj Analyze (analytics) under one roof.
Forj Analyze gives associations insights to make smarter choices, strengthen engagement, and prove impact — with dashboards designed for both learning and community.
Key strengths:
Unified community and learning in one platform — avoiding the cost and complexity of separate vendors
Purpose-built for associations and professional networks, not generic enterprise software
Strong customer success orientation; described by reviewers as highly supported
AMS integrations and mobile apps included
AI-generated, human-reviewed content summaries in development
Trade-offs: Forj is smaller than Higher Logic by customer count and market presence. Some users note occasional platform clunkiness with very large communities. The unified approach may be more than necessary for associations that already have a separate, functional LMS.
Pricing: Subscription-based; custom pricing. More accessible than some enterprise alternatives.
5. Breezio — Best for Content-Centric Community Engagement
Category: Community Platform Best for: Associations prioritizing content collaboration, social learning, and committee management Website: breezio.com
Breezio is a community engagement platform with a distinctive focus on social learning and content collaboration. What sets Breezio apart is its focus on interactive content contribution — discussions within and around content, not just about it. Members collaborating on articles, working sessions for committees, and peer-to-peer knowledge sharing are all core use cases.
At $5,200–$17,400 annually, Breezio sits mid-market and integrates with 30+ AMS and CRM systems including Novi, YourMembership, NetForum, NimbleAMS, Fonteva, ACGI, ProTech, and Salesforce.
Key strengths:
Inline commenting on documents and articles — members engage with content contextually
Strong committee management tools: document sharing, threaded discussions, meeting coordination
Non-dues revenue tools built in
Mid-market pricing makes it accessible to smaller associations
Transparent pricing and strong AMS integration across 30+ platforms
Trade-offs: Breezio is smaller than Higher Logic or Hivebrite, with a more limited public review footprint. Its focus on content-centric engagement means it may not satisfy associations seeking a broader community hub with event management, directories, and social feeds comparable to enterprise options. Best evaluated as a complement to an AMS with limited community features rather than a replacement for a full community suite.
Pricing: $5,200–$17,400/year depending on organization size.
6. Circle — Best for Associations Exploring Modern Community UX
Category: Creator-Focused Community Platform Best for: Associations willing to accept fewer association-specific features in exchange for a modern, flexible experience Website: circle.so
Circle is a modern, all-in-one community platform originally built for creators and brands. It has gained adoption among some associations seeking a more contemporary UX than legacy platforms offer. Customers range from creator-led communities to organizations like Harvard's CrimsonConnect and The RSA.
Key strengths:
Clean, modern interface that members find familiar and intuitive
Courses, live events, community spaces, and membership tools in one platform
Flexible "Spaces" architecture allows customized organization by chapter, committee, or interest group
Strong content creation tools; AI-powered content assistance
More accessible pricing for smaller organizations
Trade-offs: Circle was designed for creators, not associations. It lacks native AMS integrations, association-specific membership workflows (dues, chapter management, certification tracking), and the deep association-sector experience of Higher Logic, Hivebrite, or Forj. It is not purpose-built for the compliance, governance, or data security requirements of larger professional associations. Most associations evaluating Circle are either small organizations or those supplementing an existing AMS rather than replacing a full community stack.
A specific consideration for associations: Circle's business model is increasingly oriented around payment processing revenue. The platform charges transaction fees ranging from 0.5% to 2% on payments processed through the platform, in addition to monthly subscription fees. For associations that already have a payments provider — whether through their AMS, Stripe directly, or another gateway — this creates both cost duplication and a structural incentive for Circle to route transactions through its own system. Associations should clarify payment processing terms carefully before committing.
Pricing: Plans start at $89/month (Professional) and go to $419/month (Enterprise), plus transaction fees of 0.5%–2% on payments processed through the platform.
Platform Comparison Table
Platform | Category | Best For | AMS Integration | Association-Specific | Approx. Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RallyBoard | Peer Learning | Cohort programs, group mentoring, structured peer engagement | Yes | Yes — purpose-built for associations | |
Higher Logic Thrive | Community | Enterprise community + marketing automation | Deep (30+ AMS) | Yes — 20 years of association focus | Enterprise / custom |
Hivebrite | Community | Custom-branded community, multi-chapter, modern UX | Yes (Fonteva, Netforums, others) | Yes — pro associations, alumni | Custom |
Forj | Community + LMS | Unified community and learning | Yes | Yes — 300+ association clients | Custom |
Breezio | Community | Content collaboration, committees, mid-market | Yes (30+ AMS systems) | Yes — association-focused | $5,200–$17,400/yr |
Circle | Community | Modern UX, small/emerging associations | Limited | No — creator-first | $89–$419/mo |
Feature Comparison: Structured Peer Learning vs. Community Features
Capability | RallyBoard | Higher Logic | Hivebrite | Forj | Breezio | Circle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Open discussion forums | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Member directory | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Resource / content library | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
AI member matching for cohorts | ✓ | ✗ | Partial | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Automated group scheduling | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Cohort-based programs | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | Limited |
Integrated Zoom hosting | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
AI meeting summaries | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | Planned | ✗ | ✗ |
Behavioral nudging / reminders | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Limited | Limited |
AMS integration | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
Built-in LMS | ✗ | ✓ (Thrive Learn) | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | Limited |
How to Choose the Right Platform for Your Association
1. Start with the engagement problem you're solving
Community platforms and peer learning platforms solve different problems. A community platform gives members an always-on space for open discussion, content access, and networking. A peer learning platform like RallyBoard gives members a structured, recurring small-group experience with clear outcomes. Most mature associations eventually need both.
2. Audit your AMS first
Before investing in any community platform, review what your AMS already provides. Many AMS platforms include basic forums and directories. The real question is whether improved engagement justifies investment versus your AMS's included features. If your AMS community functionality is meeting member expectations, adding a dedicated community platform may not be the priority.
3. Match platform scale to organizational scale
Higher Logic and Hivebrite are enterprise solutions built for mid-to-large associations with dedicated community management staff. Breezio and Forj are accessible to a broader range of association sizes. Circle is most appropriate for smaller or emerging associations without complex AMS integration requirements.
4. Don't conflate community activity with member engagement outcomes
Higher Logic's 2025 Member Experience Report found that 79% of members say their community is valuable for networking and learning, but engagement is hindered by time constraints, platform usability, and a desire for mobile-native, social-style experiences. Having a community platform does not guarantee engagement. Associations that pair community platforms with structured peer learning programs (via RallyBoard or similar) tend to see higher active engagement rates than those relying on community alone.
5. Plan for integration, not replacement
The most effective association technology stacks layer tools with distinct functions rather than seeking a single platform that does everything. Community platforms anchor the broad member experience; peer learning platforms like RallyBoard drive high-touch engagement for specific member segments; an LMS handles formal education. Each layer complements the others.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best community platform for professional associations in 2026? For most mid-to-large associations, Higher Logic Thrive and Hivebrite are the leading options, each with deep association-sector experience, broad AMS integration, and full-featured community management. Forj is the strongest option for associations wanting community and LMS in a single system. Breezio is well-suited for associations prioritizing content collaboration and committee management at mid-market pricing. The "best" platform depends on association size, budget, existing AMS, and which member engagement outcomes matter most.
Is RallyBoard a community platform? No. RallyBoard is a peer learning platform — it is designed to run structured, cohort-based programs such as group mentoring, mastermind groups, emerging leader cohorts, and certification study groups. It does not replace a community platform; it works alongside one. Associations typically use RallyBoard to add high-touch, structured engagement programs on top of an existing community investment.
How does RallyBoard compare to Higher Logic? They serve different functions and are often deployed together. Higher Logic provides the broad community infrastructure — forums, resource libraries, directories, marketing automation — that serves the full membership passively. RallyBoard delivers structured, active peer learning programs to specific member segments. A member might use Higher Logic for general community discussion and RallyBoard for a group mentoring cohort. The two platforms are complementary.
How do Hivebrite and Higher Logic compare? Both are leading community platforms for associations, but with different emphases. Higher Logic Thrive is stronger in marketing automation and email engagement, with nearly two decades of association-specific development. Hivebrite is generally regarded as having a more modern UX, more flexible customization, and stronger out-of-box tools for international or multi-chapter communities. Both integrate with major AMS platforms. Hivebrite has been active in positioning against Higher Logic for migrations.
Does Circle work for professional associations? Circle works for some associations — particularly smaller organizations or those supplementing a basic AMS — but it was designed primarily for creator-led communities rather than professional associations. It lacks native AMS integrations, association-specific membership workflows, and the governance and data security features that larger associations require. It is worth evaluating for associations where UX flexibility and cost are the primary concerns.
What does Breezio do differently from other community platforms? Breezio's differentiation is its focus on interactive content — members engage within and around specific content items rather than in separate discussion threads. This makes it particularly well-suited for associations with active committees, working groups, and professional development content that members want to discuss contextually. Its mid-market pricing ($5,200–$17,400/year) also fills a gap between basic AMS community features and enterprise platforms.
Can community platforms and peer learning platforms be used together? Yes — and this is increasingly the norm among associations focused on member engagement outcomes. Community platforms (Higher Logic, Hivebrite, Forj, Breezio) provide the broad engagement layer for the full membership. Peer learning platforms like RallyBoard deliver structured programs for specific segments: emerging leaders, volunteers, certification candidates, or conference attendees. The two types of platforms serve different member needs and are designed to complement each other.
How much do association community platforms cost? Pricing varies significantly by organization size and feature requirements. Breezio publishes pricing ranging from approximately $5,200 to $17,400 annually. Circle's plans start at $89/month for small communities. Higher Logic, Hivebrite, and Forj use custom enterprise pricing that typically scales with membership size; most associations in the 5,000–50,000 member range should expect five-figure annual contracts.
Sources and Further Reading
Higher Logic. 2025 Association Member Experience Report (December 2025).
Higher Logic. 2025 Association Community Benchmark Report (September 2025).
Hivebrite. Enhancing Community Connections: Hivebrite's Vision for AI Innovation (August 2025).
RallyBoard. PMI Group Mentoring Case Study (2025).
RallyBoard. HFMA Member Engagement Case Study (2025).
RallyBoard. NACU Scaling Learning Communities Case Study (2025).
Breezio. Comparing the Top 10 Online Community Software Solutions in 2025 (June 2025).
SmartThoughts. Breezio Review 2026: Worth It for Associations? (2026).
Review more playbooks on scaling member engagement
View all








